What problem do you actually solve for internal teams?

Most organizations manage rankings and ratings ad hoc, in silos and often with no central overview. We provide a single, up-to-date picture of opportunities, requirements, ownership and deadlines so relevant functions (e.g., HR, ESG, Communications and Investor Relations) can coordinate efforts instead of reacting at the last minute.

What is the benefit compared to handling this fully in-house?

Internal teams may often lack the time and specialist overview to monitor the fast-changing ranking landscape. We bring structured market knowledge, an expert perspective on what is and is not worth doing, and clear framework for governance, processes, and communication. You keep control of content and decisions. We provide structure, efficiency and continuity.

Which types of awards and rankings do you cover?

We cover all ratings and rankings whenever companies are assessed by a third party based on a structured approach on a regular basis. Our ranking database includes broad topics across people/culture ( e.g. “Best Employer”), ESG/sustainability, corporate governance, sector-specific performance, innovation and brand image indices. Together with you, we prioritize the most material instruments for your company and de-prioritize low-relevance or purely promotional schemes.

Do you influence the outcome of rankings or just organize the process?

We do not buy placements or garantee positions. Our role is to make sure you understand the methodology , know what is realistically achievable and can submit complete, consistent and timely information. Better internal data and better processes improve your chances, but the final result always remains with the ranking owner.

How can sustainability reporting support better decision-making?

Effective reporting focuses on material topics and connects data to management decisions. When sustainability reporting is aligned with strategy, risk management, and governance, it provides insights that support prioritisation, investment decisions, and performance steering rather than merely fulfilling disclosure requirements.

What makes sustainability reporting credible and defensible?

Credible reporting is consistent, traceable, and aligned with how the organisation is actually managed. It clearly explains what is reported, why it is reported, and how information is used internally. Credibility is built through coherence, not volume.

FAQs Archive - RATE GmbH

What problem do you actually solve for internal teams?
What is the benefit compared to handling this fully in-house?
Which types of awards and rankings do you cover?
Do you influence the outcome of rankings or just organize the process?
How can sustainability reporting support better decision-making?
What makes sustainability reporting credible and defensible?

This website uses cookies and third party services. OK